MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mechanisms of microbial carbon sequestration in the ocean - future research directions

2014· preprint· en· W4378761678 on OpenAlexaff
Nianzhi Jiao, Carol Robinson, Farooq Azam, Helmuth Thomas, Federico Baltar, Hongyue Dang, Nick J. Hardman‐Mountford, Martin Johnson, David L. Kirchman, Boris Koch, Laurent Legendre, C. Li, Jiawei Liu, Tingwei Luo, Ya‐Wei Luo, Aditee Mitra, Anastasia Romanou, Kai Tang, X. Wang, Chong Zhang, Renyi Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon sequestrationEnvironmental scienceCarbon fibersEarth scienceAstrobiologyGeologyComputer scienceCarbon dioxideBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.010
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology→French-language works237,207→