Case Series of Stillbirths Due to Syphilis in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data on the incidence and characteristics of stillbirths attributed to congenital syphilis were collected. METHODS: We extracted data on stillbirths in the Edmonton Zone on January 1, 2015, through June 30, 2021, born to persons diagnosed with infectious syphilis (primary, secondary, early latent, or early neurosyphilis) during pregnancy or at the time of delivery. RESULTS: Of 314 infants documented to be exposed to infectious syphilis during gestation, 16 (5.1%) were stillborn. Three of the 16 females with stillbirths were diagnosed with syphilis during pregnancy but not treated, 12 were diagnosed only at the time of stillbirth (1 of whom was treated early in pregnancy and presumably reinfected), and 1 had a stillbirth in the week after one dose of benzathine penicillin G. CONCLUSIONS: Stillbirths due to congenital syphilis were all due to failure to treat syphilis in pregnancy. Innovative strategies to prevent syphilis in the community and to reach those experiencing barriers to care are urgently required to not miss opportunities to diagnose and treat syphilis as early as possible during pregnancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".