Bidirectional feature matching based on deep pairwise contrastive learning for multiparametric MRI image synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Multi-parametric MR image synthesis is an effective approach for several clinical applications where specific modalities may be unavailable to reach a diagnosis. While technical and practical conditions limit the acquisition of new modalities for a patient, multimodal image synthesis combines multiple modalities to synthesize the desired modality. Approach. In this paper, we propose a new multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) synthesis model, which generates the target MRI modality from two other available modalities, in pathological MR images. We first adopt a contrastive learning approach that trains an encoder network to extract a suitable feature representation of the target space. Secondly, we build a synthesis network that generates the target image from a common feature space that approximately matches the contrastive learned space of the target modality. We incorporate a bidirectional feature learning strategy that learns a multimodal feature matching function, in two opposite directions, to transform the augmented multichannel input in the learned target space. Overall, our training synthesis loss is expressed as the combination of the reconstruction loss and a bidirectional triplet loss, using a pair of features. Main results. Compared to other state-of-the-art methods, the proposed model achieved an average improvement rate of 3.9% and 3.6% on the IXI and BraTS’18 datasets respectively. On the tumor BraTS’18 dataset, our model records the highest Dice score of 0.793(0.04) for preserving the synthesized tumor regions in the segmented images. Significance. Validation of the proposed model on two public datasets confirms the efficiency of the model to generate different MR contrasts, and preserve tumor areas in the synthesized images. In addition, the model is flexible to generate head and neck CT image from MR acquisitions. In future work, we plan to validate the model using interventional iMRI contrasts for MR-guided neurosurgery applications, and also for radiotherapy applications. Clinical measurements will be collected during surgery to evaluate the model’s performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".