MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378803348 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/acda78

Bidirectional feature matching based on deep pairwise contrastive learning for multiparametric MRI image synthesis

2023· article· en· W4378803348 on OpenAlexafffund
Redha Touati, Samuel Kadoury

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Artificial intelligenceModality (human–computer interaction)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature vectorFeature learningMatching (statistics)Deep learningPairwise comparisonModalitiesParametric statisticsImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. Multi-parametric MR image synthesis is an effective approach for several clinical applications where specific modalities may be unavailable to reach a diagnosis. While technical and practical conditions limit the acquisition of new modalities for a patient, multimodal image synthesis combines multiple modalities to synthesize the desired modality. Approach. In this paper, we propose a new multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) synthesis model, which generates the target MRI modality from two other available modalities, in pathological MR images. We first adopt a contrastive learning approach that trains an encoder network to extract a suitable feature representation of the target space. Secondly, we build a synthesis network that generates the target image from a common feature space that approximately matches the contrastive learned space of the target modality. We incorporate a bidirectional feature learning strategy that learns a multimodal feature matching function, in two opposite directions, to transform the augmented multichannel input in the learned target space. Overall, our training synthesis loss is expressed as the combination of the reconstruction loss and a bidirectional triplet loss, using a pair of features. Main results. Compared to other state-of-the-art methods, the proposed model achieved an average improvement rate of 3.9% and 3.6% on the IXI and BraTS’18 datasets respectively. On the tumor BraTS’18 dataset, our model records the highest Dice score of 0.793(0.04) for preserving the synthesized tumor regions in the segmented images. Significance. Validation of the proposed model on two public datasets confirms the efficiency of the model to generate different MR contrasts, and preserve tumor areas in the synthesized images. In addition, the model is flexible to generate head and neck CT image from MR acquisitions. In future work, we plan to validate the model using interventional iMRI contrasts for MR-guided neurosurgery applications, and also for radiotherapy applications. Clinical measurements will be collected during surgery to evaluate the model’s performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207