MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378803661 · doi:10.1017/s1054204323000126

Embodied and Immersed Is the New Professional - Reconstruction, Replication and Re-enactment in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Edited by Sven Dupré, Anna Harris, Julia Kursell, Patricia Lulof, and Maartje Stols-Witlox. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020; 298 pp. €124.00 cloth, e-book available. - Experimenting with Ethnography: A Companion to Analysis. Edited by Andrea Ballestero and Brit Ross Winthereik. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2021; 301 pp. $104.95 cloth, $27.95 paper, e-book available. - Transmissions: Critical Tactics for Making and Communicating Research. Edited by Kat Jungnickel. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2020; 264 pp.; illustrations. $35.00 cloth. - Theatre and Performance in the Neoliberal University: Responses to an Academy in Crisis. Edited by Kim Solga. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020; 262 pp.; illustrations. $160.00 cloth, $48.95 paper, e-book available.

2023· article· en· W4378803661 on OpenAlex
Yelena Gluzman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTDR/The Drama Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Education and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfessionalizationEmbodied cognitionSociologyHumanitiesReplication (statistics)ArtArt historySocial sciencePhilosophyMedicineEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three recent anthologies in science and technology studies show how standards for scholarly professionalization are changing. Such changes may facilitate new alliances for theatre faculty plagued by old feuds and the increasingly neoliberal university.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it