Perception-Aware Image-Based Visual Servoing of Aggressive Quadrotor UAVs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The maintenance of visual features within the sensor field of view poses a significant challenge for underactuated aerial vehicles such as quadrotors, especially during aggressive maneuvers. However, the existing image-based visual servo (IBVS) control methods rely on strict target visibility assumptions or impose excessive constraints on the quadrotor's agility to meet this requirement. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the visibility constraint defined in prior works remains unverified in aggressive flight tests. To address these issues, we present a robust IBVS scheme for quadrotors to perform aggressive maneuvers while ensuring target visibility. Based on the nonlinear model-predictive control framework, we propose a novel underactuation compensation scheme to eliminate the need for a virtual camera frame, which enables us to formulate the true target visibility constraint. We then introduce a quaternion-based representation of spherical visual features to handle the nonsmooth vector field problem on the 2-sphere and derive its corresponding image kinematics. We validate our method through three challenging visual servo tasks where agile maneuvers are desired: fast landing, aggressive long-distance flight, and dynamic object tracking. Extensive simulation and experiment show that our method consistently achieves a target-visible rate of 100% in all the image frames, even under a maximum pitch of 21.04$^{\circ }$. The results validate the effectiveness of our visibility constraint under large robot rotations and underscore its importance in enabling robust and aggressive flights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".