Boosting Homeownership Affordability for Low-Income Communities in Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of inflation, regional minimum wages, and subsidized housing costs on the purchasing power of low-income communities needing to own a home as an intervening variable.This study uses the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method to analyze the data from the districts of East Java, Indonesia.Broadly speaking, this study found that the higher the need to own a home, the higher the purchasing power of Low-Income Communities because the population is increasing, so the need to own a place to live is also directly proportional.The practical implication of this study is that it can contribute useful information relating to the effect of inflation, regional minimum wages, and subsidized house prices on the purchasing power of low-income communities with a need to own a house as an intervening variable.Therefore, the government needs to control the impact caused by inflation in the form of rising bank interest rates by subsidizing it so that it remains stable.In the future, the government should include housing allowances in the minimum wage component.The government should not only subsidize house prices, but also production costs, so that the price of subsidized houses remains stable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it