Digital Divide of Regions: Possible Growth Points for Their Digital Maturity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to research the process of digitalization of the regional economy and society in order to identify the root causes for discrepancy in their progress and determine the main directions for improving regional management systems to reduce their digital inequality.This article analyzes the digital development of regions in Russia, based on statistical data from 2013 to 2020.The results show a significant gap between the leading and the underdeveloped regions.The study identifies the root causes of the imbalance and backwardness in digitalization, and provides insights for the further digital transformation of regions in the implementation of the Digital Economy National Program.The proposed methodology to assess the digital competitiveness of regions provides for an analysis of the key areas of digital transformation directly related to the digitalization of the public services sector, the economy and the social sphere.It enables to consider the innovative potential in the regional context, track the digital transformation of organizations and their involvement in digital ecosystems, and identify changes in households in terms of connecting to ICT and using personal computers, based on their digital literacy and competencies.The article provides valuable insights, which can be useful for managers and members of the scientific community involved in evaluating the effectiveness of developing the digital potential of regions and in promoting digital transformation in Russia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it