MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4378838164 · doi:10.1101/2023.05.29.542701

Huge narwhal displacement following shipping of iron ore in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago

2023· preprint· en· W4378838164 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lars Witting

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticArchipelagoInletGeographyPopulationSound (geography)OceanographyMetapopulationPhysical geographyGeologyArchaeologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With 100,000 narwhals inhabiting populations in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, the Northwest Passage runs through the largest aggregation of narwhals in the world. I use a metapopulation analysis that covers eight of the narwhal populations in the area to estimate that about 25,000 narwhals have emigrated from Eclipse Sound to Admiralty Inlet since 2007, causing almost total population collapse in Eclipse Sound following shipping of iron ore through Milne Inlet and Eclipse Sound. It is estimated that up to about 30,000 narwhals may vanish in the long run, unless shipping is increasingly regulated, or narwhals adapt to the disturbance and reinhabits the abandoned areas. Reflecting only a local disturbance, these population effects warn against intense shipping in other fjords with narwhals, and against a potentially much larger impact from increased shipping through the Northwest Passage in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→