MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Beat Frequency Modulated Single-Stage Soft-Switched Microinverter

2023· article· en· W4378842933 on OpenAlexaff
Milad Heidari, Mohammad Ebrahimi, S. Ali Khajehoddin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar micro-inverterElectronic engineeringVoltageWaveformComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringMaximum power point trackingInverter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel single-stage single-phase microinverter with a beat frequency modulation (BFM) and fully soft-switching operation is presented for photovoltaic (PV) applications. To convert the low-level DC voltage of the PV panel to the desired AC voltage of the grid, a DC-AC converter is required to amplify the input DC voltage and also make a sinusoidal AC voltage at the output. The proposed microinverter is configured based on a resonant LLC converter to provide both amplification and isolation. A new frequency modulation is applied to the converter to provide a pure sinusoidal waveform at the output of the microinverter. The soft-switching conditions are provided for all switches of the converter due to the utilization of the resonant elements. The rectifier and unfolder at the output stage of the microinverter are merged to utilize the minimum number of semiconductors. A new control strategy is employed to provide the output current regulation based on a single-phase DQ current controller. The proposed beat frequency modulation and topology derivation of the microinverter are discussed in this paper. To validate the theoretical analysis, a 250W prototype is implemented and experimental results are represented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207