MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378883245 · doi:10.33182/agon.v13i2.1671

Masterpiece in Focus: Friedrich Nietzsche and the Artists of the New Weimar

2020· article· en· W4378883245 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Agonist · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionArt historyBannerSubject (documents)ArtWeimar RepublicThe artsFocus (optics)Modern artVisual artsHistoryPerformance artArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is not often that a philosopher is the subject of a major art exhibition. Yet as I walked towards the entrance to the National Gallery of Canada in Ottawa I could see the sculpted profile of Nietzsche looking out, from a banner promoting Friedrich Nietzsche and the Artists of the New Weimar. Curated by Sebastian Schütze, a Professor of Art History at the University of Vienna, this exhibition looks at the material histories of the Nietzsche Archive and its influence on the arts, which we encounter through the artworks, photographs, publications and documents on display. Not exactly a show of artworks, but also not strictly a display of historical documentation, Schütze presents us with a moment in time that is caught between the realities of the impact of Nietzsche’s ideas and the complex fabrications of his legacy, with the Nietzsche Archive in Weimar playing a key role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it