MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378893489 · doi:10.1177/1089313x0100500303

Internal Rotation Knee Injury during Ballroom Dance

2001· article· en· W4378893489 on OpenAlex
Christine L. Tsien, Elly Trepman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dance Medicine & Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceMedicineBallroomBallet dancerBalletKnee JointRotation (mathematics)AnatomySurgeryArtVisual artsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dance injuries associated with internal rotation of the leg are unusual and the injuries observed in ballet, modern, and aerobic dance are often associated with the externally rotated (turned out) or neutral (parallel) positions. This report presents a case of an international-style ballroom dancer who sustained a strain to the popliteus tendon without lateral meniscus tear during execution of the syncopated spin, a dance figure involving internal rotation of the leg. Tansient locking of the knee occurred. Pain was located at the posterolateral knee. Examination showed posterolateral joint line tenderness and pain with active external rotation of the flexed knee. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed effusion around the popliteus tendon. The patient recovered with activity limitation over several weeks. The case demonstrates that ballroom dance activity may result in an internal rotation injury to the knee, an injury that is uncommon in other dance forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it