Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome in a Patient With Recurrent Hodgkin Lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) is an acquired syndrome characterized by clinical and laboratory signs of cholestasis with pathologic findings of interlobular bile duct paucity in liver biopsy specimens. VBDS can result from a variety of conditions including infections, autoimmune diseases, adverse drug reactions, and neoplastic processes. Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a rare cause of VBDS. The mechanism by which HL leads to VBDS remains unknown. Development of VBDS in patients with HL portends an extremely poor prognosis due to the risk of progression to fulminant hepatic failure. Treatment of the underlying lymphoma has been demonstrated to offer increased probability of recovery from VBDS. The decision to treat and choice of treatment of the underlying lymphoma is often complicated by the hepatic dysfunction characteristic of VBDS. We present the case of a patient who presented with dyspnea and jaundice in the context of recurrent HL and VBDS. We additionally review the literature on HL complicated by VBDS with specific focus on treatment paradigms for management of these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".