Effect of red blood cell storage time in pediatric cardiac surgery patients: A subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether or not transfusion of fresh red blood cells (RBCs) reduced the incidence of new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome compared with standard-issue RBCs in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery.MethodsPreplanned secondary analysis of the Age of Blood in Children in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit study, an international randomized controlled trial. This study included children enrolled in the Age of Blood in Children in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit trial and admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were randomized to receive either fresh (stored ≤7 days) or standard-issue RBCs. The primary outcome measure was new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, measured up to 28 days postrandomization or at pediatric intensive care unit discharge, or death.ResultsOne hundred seventy-eight patients (median age, 0.6 years; interquartile range, 0.3-2.6 years) were included with 89 patients randomized to the fresh RBCs group (median length of storage, 5 days; interquartile range, 4-6 days) and 89 to the standard-issue RBCs group (median length of storage, 18 days; interquartile range, 13-22 days). There were no statistically significant differences in new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome between fresh (43 out of 89 [48.3%]) and standard-issue RBCs groups (38 out of 88 [43.2%]), with a relative risk of 1.12 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.54; P = .49) and an unadjusted absolute risk difference of 5.1% (95% CI, −9.5% to 19.8%; P = .49).ConclusionsIn neonates and children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, the use of fresh RBCs did not reduce the incidence of new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome compared with the standard-issue RBCs. A larger trial is needed to confirm these results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".