MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378951652 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7994067

Cost Calculator

2023· report· en· W4378951652 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud Eltholth, Joao Sucena Afonso, Didier Raboisson, Guillaume Lhermie, Jonathan Rushton

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typereport
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeEuropean Commission
KeywordsCalculatorComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the cost-calculator was to provide an universal and adaptable tool to calculate the costs of interventions for AMU in livestock, poultry and aquaculture production systems. The deterministic costing tool was developed in Microsoft Excel Professional Plus (2016) and consists on a series of steps in which the user will enter the required inputs specific to the production system and the type of intervention/s. This tool is adapted from the WHO costing and budgeting tool for National Action Plan (NAP) on antimicrobial resistance (AMR)1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0870.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAntibiotic Use and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207