Effect of the Maintenance Strategy on the Performance and Efficiency of the Gas Turbine Unit: A Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the intense competition characterizing the volatile power sector, the gas turbine industry is currently facing new challenges of increasing operational flexibility, reducing operating costs, and improving reliability and availability while mitigating environmental impact. In this complex and changing sector, the gas turbine community can meet a range of these challenges by developing highly accurate, computationally accurate and efficient diagnostic and warning systems to assess engine health. Recent studies have shown that monitoring engine gas path performance remains the cornerstone for making informed decisions in the operation and maintenance of gas turbines. Describes a newly developed engine performance monitoring methodology, diagnostic and forecasting techniques. The inception of performance monitoring and its evolution over time, the techniques used to generate a high-quality dataset using adaptive engine model performance, and the effects of computational intelligence techniques on enhancing the implementation of engine fault diagnosis are reviewed. Furthermore, recent developments in alarm technologies designed to enhance the maintenance decision-making scheme and the main causes of gas turbine performance degradation are discussed to facilitate the identification of unit faults. Gas turbine diagnostics and forecasts are one of the most important key technologies to enable the transition from scheduled maintenance to maintenance status in order to improve engine reliability and availability and reduce life cycle costs to organize, evaluate and identify patterns and trends in the literature as well as identify research gaps and recommend new research areas in the field of gas turbine performance-based monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".