MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378965586 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560210

Mission-Planner Mapped Autonomous Robotic Lawn Mower

2023· article· fr· W4378965586 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawnPlannerComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An autonomous solar powered lawn mower deployable to a pre-mapped area was developed.The device receives directional sense using Mission Planner for pre-mapping of the workspace.This gives the device full control over the desired workspace, helping it to maneuver obstacles, including stones and trees, and get the work done without human intervention.The Autonomous device is made up of a robotic chassis, having four wheels and a DC motor connected to its underside, which is used to move the cutting blade.The blade cuts the grass beneath the lawn mower as the device navigates the workspace.Two microcontrollers were used to achieve the automation of this device.The first microcontroller was used to achieve obstacle avoidance while the second complimentary microcontroller was used to navigate the workspace autonomously.Holybro Kakute F7 HDV serves as the system central processing unit and it uses the Ardupilot technology to achieve navigation.It is particularly optimized for rovers due to its high resistance to vibration, ruggedness and size.A prototype of the robotic mower was developed and its operational performance satisfactory.The size of the pre-mapped area can vary, but a total distance of 135m was covered for the testing that was done.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it