MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378965586 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560210

Mission-Planner Mapped Autonomous Robotic Lawn Mower

2023· article· fr· W4378965586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adekunle Taofeek Oyelami, Oladipupo Maothon Bamgbose, Olusola Akinbolaji Akintunlaji

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawnPlannerComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An autonomous solar powered lawn mower deployable to a pre-mapped area was developed. The device receives directional sense using Mission Planner for pre-mapping of the workspace. This gives the device full control over the desired workspace, helping it to maneuver obstacles, including stones and trees, and get the work done without human intervention. The Autonomous device is made up of a robotic chassis, having four wheels and a DC motor connected to its underside, which is used to move the cutting blade. The blade cuts the grass beneath the lawn mower as the device navigates the workspace. Two microcontrollers were used to achieve the automation of this device. The first microcontroller was used to achieve obstacle avoidance while the second complimentary microcontroller was used to navigate the workspace autonomously. Holybro Kakute F7 HDV serves as the system central processing unit and it uses the Ardupilot technology to achieve navigation. It is particularly optimized for rovers due to its high resistance to vibration, ruggedness and size. A prototype of the robotic mower was developed and its operational performance satisfactory. The size of the pre-mapped area can vary, but a total distance of 135m was covered for the testing that was done.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicRobotics and Automated SystemsFrench-language works237,207