MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

空腹血糖对无症状颈动脉粥样硬化斑块患者认知功能的影响—— 1项针对非城镇居民的调查 Effect of Fasting Blood Glucose on Cognitive Function in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque: A Survey of Rural Residents

2022· article· zh· W4378966735 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
张冠一 张倩

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsymptomaticMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyCognitionCarotid arteriesPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的 探索空腹血糖对无症状颈动脉粥样硬化斑块患者认知功能的影响。 方法 研究人群为2015年9月-2017年9月期间参与中国国家脑卒中高危人群筛查和干预(China national stroke screen survey,CNSSS)项目,北京市昌平区北七家社区卫生服务中心和北京市顺义区空港医院筛查点的40岁以上非城镇居民。入组标准为既往无脑血管疾病及相关神经功能缺损症状和体征,且行超声检查确诊存在颈动脉粥样硬化斑块。采用MoCA量表(北京版)评价认知功能。采用多因素logistic回归分析空腹血糖与认知障碍(MoCA<26分)的关系。 结果 共有1446名居民纳入本项研究,平均年龄为62.0±8.3岁,男性809人(55.9%),受教育年限≤12年者1364人(94.3%),其中936人(64.7%)存在认知障碍。单因素logistic回归分析显示,空腹血糖与认知障碍相关(趋势P=0.003)。校正混杂因素后,空腹血糖升高仍然是认知障碍的独立危险因素(趋势P=0.008),相较于最低四分位数空腹血糖水平,最高四分位数空腹血糖水平患者的认知障碍风险增加了0.49倍(OR 1.49,95%CI 1.10~2.02,P=0.010)。 结论 空腹血糖升高是无症状颈动脉粥样硬化斑块患者认知障碍的独立危险因素。 Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of fasting blood glucose on cognitive function in patients with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Methods Participants aged ≥40 years who participated in the China National Stroke Screen Survey (CNSSS) program between September 2015 to September 2017, from two rural communities (Beiqijia community, Changping District, Beijing and Konggang community, Shunyi District, Beijing), were enrolled in this study. The included patients had carotid atherosclerotic plaques confirmed by carotid ultrasound, yet no cerebrovascular diseases and neurological deficits. Cognitive function was evaluated by the Montreal cognitive assessment (Beijing version). The multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between fasting blood glucose and cognitive impairment (MoCA<26 points). Results Finally, a total of 1446 subjects were included in this study, with a mean age of 62.0±8.3 years and 809 males (55.9%). 1364 (94.3%) had an education level of no more than 12 years, and 936 (64.7%) had cognitive impairment. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that fasting blood glucose was associated with cognitive impairment (Ptrend=0.003). After adjusting for the confounding factors, fasting blood glucose was still an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment (Ptrend=0.008). The patients with the highest quartile of fasting blood glucose had an increased risk of cognitive impairment by 0.49 times, compared to patients with the lowest quartile (OR 1.49, 95%CI 1.10-2.02, P=0.010). Conclusions High fasting blood glucose was an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment in patients with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaque.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→