Exploring social workers’ spiritual meaning of their reconstruction processes after the unanticipated death of a client(s)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: This interpretive qualitative inquiry explores the spiritual meaning of their reconstruction processes of social workers after the unanticipated death of a client. Identifying existing social networks and using snowball sampling, ten social workers in British Columbia were recruited for this research. From a socially constructed and spiritual perspective, the researcher examines this process in collaboration with the ten participants. Through semistructured interviews the social work participants gave deep and rich personal stories reflecting on the experience of having a client unexpectedly die. Through a process of thematic analysis, four main themes, and nine sub-themes emerged from the data. Objective: To explore and gain a better understanding of social workers’ experiences of unanticipated client death and the spiritual meaning of their reconstruction processes after this experience. Methods: An interpretive qualitative inquiry was used for this study. A literature review was conducted to identity existing research and any gaps in research on the thesis question. Subsequently, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten social worker participants who shared their experiences of unanticipated client death and spiritual meaning of their reconstruction processes. Thematic analysis of the data, guided by Braun and Clark (2018) was undertaken. Results: Three main themes and eight subthemes about how social workers experience and process the death of a client were found. Results revealed social workers often experience multiple client deaths that can be traumatic and have long lasting impacts/memories and that making sense of this experience is generally complex, unique to the individual, and meaning was found to be tied to systemic issues in the context of client death. A comparative analysis of Indigenous and non-Indigenous agencies in relation to spiritual supports are also presented. Conclusion: The experience of having a client death(s) is impactful and was found to be generally traumatic for social workers. Spirituality may play a part in how this experience is processed and understood. Systemic issues and current neoliberal systems were reported to be main factors in how death was understood in the context of worker-client relationship. Informal support in the workplace was perceived as essential and formal workplace supports were seen as ingenuine and challenging to access. Spiritual and culturally based supports naturally found within Indigenous culture were perceived as a welcome support, especially in the context of client bereavement. Finally, through this inquiry it was apparent there needs to be more research about the understudied impacts of experiencing the unanticipated death of a client, how social workers perceive, and access formal workplace supports, and how individual social workers and organizations draw from and utilize spirituality in social work practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".