Comparison Seepage Performance for Different Drainage Systems of Rainwater Harvesting Dam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In arid and semi-arid regions, rainwater harvesting (RWH) system may achieve a new water source.RWH dam can be constructed, based on criteria of small earth dam, at the out let of the selected catchment area to store the harvested rainwater in its reservoir.RWH dam may suffered by seepage problem (the flow of water through dam body).Seepage problem represents a major problem that may cause dam failure if it is not controlled.Dam failure is very dangerous resulting in property destruction and loss of life.In this study, the characteristics of seepage analysis are investigated through the proposed Al-Khoser RWH dam.Seepage modelling based on finite element method and numerical analysis has carried out using SEEP/W, a sub-program of Geo Studio.The analysis is covered eight scenarios for two types of dam (homogeneous and zoned) with different filters types (toe, horizontal, chimney, and without filter) for each dam type.In order to, make suitable decision of using core and filter including specifying filter type, seepage parameters such as total head, pore water pressure, seepage discharge, velocity and the gradient are computed.The phreatic line and factor of safety against vertical and horizontal piping are also studied and presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".