MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379031579 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32154-2_3

Applications in Data-Driven Additive Manufacturing

2023· book-chapter· en· W4379031579 on OpenAlex
Mutahar Safdar, Guy Lamouche, Padma Polash Paul, Gentry Wood, Yaoyao Fiona Zhao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Brain InstituteNational Research Council CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Computer scienceProcess (computing)Data miningEngineering drawingSystems engineeringEngineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AM lifecycle is divided into major sources, and preparation of data generated by each source is discussed separately. These sources of features can be grouped into design, process, and post-process categories. In each of these categories, major sources of additive manufacturing (AM) data are identified and used to group the applications of feature engineering in AM. Their applications are discussed in detail in the subsequent sections of this chapter. A key feature of this chapter is its tabular summaries where detailed feature engineering pipelines are presented and linked with feature source, feature form, and feature applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it