MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379033929 · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2023.3282021

Quantized Distributed Online Projection-Free Convex Optimization

2023· article· en· W4379033929 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceQuantization (signal processing)Mathematical optimizationRegretConvex functionConvex optimizationOptimization problemComputationDistributed algorithmOnline algorithmBandwidth (computing)Convergence (economics)Regular polygonAlgorithmMathematicsDistributed computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers online distributed convex constrained optimization over a time-varying multi-agent network. Agents in this network cooperate to minimize the global objective function through information exchange with their neighbors and local computation. Since the capacity or bandwidth of communication channels often is limited, a random quantizer is introduced to reduce the transmission bits. Through incorporating this quantizer, we develop a quantized distributed online projection-free optimization algorithm, which can achieve the saving of communication resources and computational costs. For different parameter settings of the quantizer, we establish the corresponding dynamic regret upper bounds of the proposed algorithm and reveal the trade-off between the convergence performance and the quantization effect. Finally, the theoretical results are illustrated by the simulation of distributed online linear regression problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it