Classification of group A rotavirus VP7 and VP4 genotypes using random forest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Group A rotaviruses are major pathogens in causing severe diarrhea in young children and neonates of many different species of animals worldwide and group A rotavirus sequence data are becoming increasingly available over time. Different methods exist that allow for rotavirus genotyping, but machine learning methods have yet to be explored. Usage of machine learning algorithms such as random forest alongside alignment-based methodology may allow for both efficient and accurate classification of circulating rotavirus genotypes through the dual classification system. Methods: Random forest models were trained on positional features obtained from pairwise and multiple sequence alignment and cross-validated using methods of repeated 10-fold cross-validation thrice and leave one- out cross validation. Models were then validated on unseen data from the testing datasets to observe real-world performance. Results: All models were found to perform strongly in classification of VP7 and VP4 genotypes with high overall accuracy and kappa values during model training (0.975–0.992, 0.970–0.989) and during model testing (0.972–0.996, 0.969–0.996), respectively. Models trained on multiple sequence alignment generally had slightly higher overall accuracy and kappa values than models trained on pairwise sequence alignment method. In contrast, pairwise sequence alignment models were found to be generally faster than multiple sequence alignment models in computational speed when models do not need to be retrained. Models that used repeated 10-fold cross-validation thrice were also found to be much faster in model computational speed than models that used leave-one-out cross validation, with no noticeable difference in overall accuracy and kappa values between the cross-validation methods. Discussion: Overall, random forest models showed strong performance in the classification of both group A rotavirus VP7 and VP4 genotypes. Application of these models as classifiers will allow for rapid and accurate classification of the increasing amounts of rotavirus sequence data that are becoming available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".