MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379055304 · doi:10.1016/j.cles.2023.100073

Techno-economic analysis of a renewable-based hybrid energy system for utility and transportation facilities in a remote community of Northern Alberta

2023· article· en· W4379055304 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tazrin Jahan Priyanka, Shivam Atre, Md Mashum Billal, Mohammad Arani

Bibliographic record

VenueCleaner Energy Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyDiesel generatorEnvironmental scienceHybrid systemAutomotive engineeringPrimary energyEnvironmental economicsDiesel fuelEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many off-grid communities in Canada are dependent on diesel generators to fulfill their utility and transportation needs, causing destructive environmental impact. This study aims to optimize and investigate the techno-economic feasibility of a hybrid renewable energy system to satisfy the 1.6 MWh/day electricity, 184.2 kWh/day thermal, and 428.38 kg/year hydrogen demand simultaneously, Trout Lake, a remote community of Northern Alberta. A novel hybrid energy system consisting of solar PV, wind turbine, electrolyzer, hydrogen tank, battery, fuel cell, hydrogen boiler, and thermal load controller has been proposed to generate electricity, heat, and hydrogen by renewables which reduce carbon emission utilizing the excess energy (EE). Five different scenarios were developed in HOMER Pro software, and the results were compared to identify the best combination of hybrid renewable energy systems. The results indicate that the fifth scenario is the optimal renewable energy system that provides a lower cost of energy (COE) at $0.675/kWh and can reduce 99.99% carbon emission compared to the diesel-based system. Additionally, the utilization of thermal load controller, battery, and fuel cell improved the system's reliability, increasing renewable fraction (RF) (93.5%) and reducing EE (58.3%) significantly. In comparison to the diesel-based systems, it is also discovered that battery energy storage is the most affordable option, while fuel cells are the more expensive choice for remote community. Sensitivity analyses are performed to measure the impact of different dominating factors on COE, EE, and RF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCleaner Energy SystemsSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207