MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379055908 · doi:10.22374/jclrs.v2isp1.30

IOP and Glaucoma

2018· article· en· W4379055908 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cherie B. Nau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Contact lens Research and Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersResearch to Prevent Blindness
KeywordsScleral lensGlaucomaOptometryOphthalmologyIntraocular pressurePopularityMedicineScleraEnthusiasmLens (geology)Intraocular lensesIntraocular lensPsychologyCorneaOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scleral lenses have steadily gained popularity and their efficacy in managing complex ocular disease is increasingly being recognized. They provide an exciting opportunity to allow us to improve vision and comfort in some of our most challenging patients. However, enthusiasm for the potential benefits of scleral lenses should not overshadow potential complications that could be caused by scleral lens wear. One specific area of concern is the possibility that scleral lenses may cause an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Contact lens Research and ScienceSame topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207