MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379058292 · doi:10.14744/jern.2021.833127

Compassion Fatigue, Empathy, and Emotional Contagion in Nursing Students

2023· article· en· W4379058292 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education and Research in Nursing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpathyEmotional contagionCompassion fatiguePsychologyCompassionEmotional laborNursingSocial psychologyClinical psychologyBurnoutMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Health professionals accompany patients with pain and suffering on their journey.Understanding the effect of empathy and emotional contagion, which is supposed to affect this journey, on compassion fatigue can help determine strategies to protect health professionals. Aim:The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship and effect level among compassion fatigue, empathy, and emotional contagion in fourth-year nursing students. Methods:The study was carried out between March 03, 2021, and March 15, 2021, with 207 students.In addition, it was carried out using the cross-sectional design, which is included in the scope of quantitative research methods.In the study, a further sample selection was not conducted and it was aimed to reach the entire population.Necessary permissions for the study have been obtained.The data were collected using "Introductory Information Form," "The Compassion Fatigue-Short Scale," "The Toronto Empathy Scale," and "The emotional contagion scale."The data were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov, kurtosis, skewness, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman test.In addition, regression tests were applied for relational questions.Results: About 91.8% of the participants were women and the average age was 22.10 ± 1.27.While compassion fatigue had a significant relationship with emotional contagion (P < .001), it does not have a significant relationship with empathy (P > .05).There is a significant relationship between emotional contagion and empathy.Empathy and emotional contagion had a significant effect on compassion fatigue (r = 0.411, P < .001).In addition, it was seen that 10.9% of the variance in compassion fatigue was explained by these 2 variables. Conclusion:It was revealed that nursing students experienced compassion fatigue as a result of interaction with patients and their relatives during their clinical practice.Therefore, it is thought that empathic communication skills should be improved in nursing students without being under the effect of emotional contagion and without being harmed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.563
Teacher spread0.424 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it