Molecular characterization of human peripheral nerves using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging (DESI-MSI) is a molecular imaging method that can be used to elucidate the small-molecule composition of tissues and map their spatial information using two-dimensional ion images. This technique has been used to investigate the molecular profiles of variety of tissues, including within the central nervous system, specifically the brain and spinal cord. To our knowledge, this technique has yet to be applied to tissues of the peripheral nervous system (PNS). Data generated from such analyses are expected to advance the characterization of these structures. The study aimed to: (i) establish whether DESI-MSI can discriminate the molecular characteristics of peripheral nerves and distinguish them from surrounding tissues and (ii) assess whether different peripheral nerve subtypes are characterized by unique molecular profiles. Four different nerves for which are known to carry various nerve fiber types were harvested from a fresh cadaveric donor: mixed, motor and sensory (sciatic and femoral); cutaneous, sensory (sural); and autonomic (vagus). Tissue samples were harvested to include the nerve bundles in addition to surrounding connective tissue. Samples were flash-frozen, embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound in cross-section, and sectioned at 14 μm. Following DESI-MSI analysis, identical tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. In this proof-of-concept study, a combination of multivariate and univariate statistical methods was used to evaluate molecular differences between the nerve and adjacent tissue and between nerve subtypes. The acquired mass spectral profiles of the peripheral nerve samples presented trends in ion abundances that seemed to be characteristic of nerve tissue and spatially corresponded to the associated histology of the tissue sections. Principal component analysis (PCA) supported the separation of the samples into distinct nerve and adjacent tissue classes. This classification was further supported by the K-means clustering analysis, which showed separation of the nerve and background ions. Differences in ion expression were confirmed using ANOVA which identified statistically significant differences in ion expression between the nerve subtypes. The PCA plot suggested some separation of the nerve subtypes into four classes which corresponded with the nerve types. This was supported by the K-means clustering. Some overlap in classes was noted in these two clustering analyses. This study provides emerging evidence that DESI-MSI is an effective tool for metabolomic profiling of peripheral nerves. Our results suggest that peripheral nerves have molecular profiles that are distinct from the surrounding connective tissues and that DESI-MSI may be able to discriminate between nerve subtypes. DESI-MSI of peripheral nerves may be a valuable technique that could be used to improve our understanding of peripheral nerve anatomy and physiology. The ability to utilize ambient mass spectrometry techniques in real time could also provide an unprecedented advantage for surgical decision making, including in nerve-sparing procedures in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".