Imaging the microscopic viscoelastic anisotropy in living cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Maintaining and modulating the mechanical anisotropy is essential for biological processes. How this is achieved on the microscopic scale in living soft matter is however not always clear. Here we introduce Brillouin Light Scattering Anisotropy Microscopy (BLAM) for mapping the high-frequency viscoelastic anisotropy inside living cells. Following proof-of-principle experiments on muscle myofibers, we apply this to study two fundamental biological processes. In plant cell walls we show how a phase-transition driven switch between anisotropic-isotropic wall properties may lead to asymmetric growth. In mammalian cell nuclei we uncover a spatio-temporally oscillating elastic anisotropy correlated to chromatin condensation, with long range orientational correlations that may provide a dynamic framework for coordinating intra-nuclear processes. Our results highlight the direct and indirect role the high-frequency mechanics can play in providing dynamic structure that lead to the regulation of diverse fundamental processes in biological systems, and offer a means for studying these. BLAM should find diverse biomedical and material characterization applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".