Power Control With QoS Guarantees: A Differentiable Projection-Based Unsupervised Learning Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are emerging as a potential solution to solve NP-hard wireless resource allocation problems. However, in the presence of intricate constraints, e.g., users’ quality-of-service (QoS) constraints, guaranteeing constraint satisfaction becomes a fundamental challenge. In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised learning framework to solve the classical power control problem in a multi-user interference channel, where the objective is to maximize the network sum-rate under users’ minimum data rate or QoS requirements and power budget constraints. Utilizing a differentiable projection function, two novel deep learning (DL) solutions are pursued. The first is called Deep Implicit Projection Network (DIPNet), and the second is called Deep Explicit Projection Network (DEPNet). DIPNet utilizes a differentiable convex optimization layer to implicitly define a projection function. On the other hand, DEPNet uses an explicitly-defined projection function, which has an iterative nature and relies on a differentiable correction process. DIPNet requires convex constraints; whereas, the DEPNet does not require convexity and has a reduced computational complexity. To enhance the sum-rate performance of the proposed models even further, Frank-Wolfe algorithm (FW) has been applied to the output of the proposed models. Extensive simulations depict that the proposed DNN solutions not only improve the achievable data rate but also achieve zero constraint violation probability, compared to the existing DNNs. The proposed solutions outperform the classic optimization methods in terms of computation time complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".