GraphSAGE-Based Dynamic Spatial–Temporal Graph Convolutional Network for Traffic Prediction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traffic networks exhibit complex spatial-temporal dependencies, and accurately capturing such dependencies is critical to improving prediction accuracy. Recently, many deep learning models have been proposed for spatial-temporal dependency modeling. While numerous deep learning models have been developed for spatial-temporal dependency modeling, most rely on different types of convolutions to extract spatial and temporal correlations separately. To address this limitation, we propose a novel deep learning framework for traffic prediction called GraphSAGE-based Dynamic Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Network (DST-GraphSAGE), which can capture dynamic spatial and temporal dependencies simultaneously. Our model utilizes a spatial-temporal GraphSAGE module to extract localized spatial-temporal correlations from past observations of a node’s spatial neighbors. Meanwhile, the attention mechanism is incorporated to dynamically learn weights between traffic nodes based on graph features. Additionally, to capture long-term trends in traffic data, we employ dilated causal convolution as the temporal convolution layer. A series of numerical experiments are conducted on five real-world datasets, which demonstrates the effectiveness of our model for spatial-temporal dependency modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it