Investigating the performance of non‐standard characteristics‐based overcurrent relays and their optimum coordination in distributed generators connected networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To handle the challenges attributed to the distributed generators, the protection system of distribution networks needs to be evolved. Recent protection schemes modify the standard characteristics of overcurrent relays, called non‐standard characteristics. These non‐standard characteristics are mostly case‐dependent and have limitations in solving the variety of protection challenges attributed to distributed generators. This paper analyses the performance of six voltage‐based non‐standard characteristics on photovoltaic distributed generators (PVDG) penetrated 3‐bus, 8‐bus, and IEEE 30‐bus distribution grid, as well as the 9‐bus Canadian radial distribution grid with synchronous distributed generator, wind turbine generator, and PVDG penetrations. Besides that, the optimum coordination of these non‐standard characteristics‐based overcurrent relays is a complex problem due to the involvement of additional controlling parameters. To find the best suitable method, a comparative analysis of the genetic algorithm, differential evolution, artificial bee colony, harmony search algorithm, firefly algorithm, cuckoo search algorithm and particle swarm optimization are performed for optimum relay coordination. The outcomes of the paper are thoroughly discussed for future research on non‐standard characteristics development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".