MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4379207345 · doi:10.25071/1708-6701.40458

Yourcenar - Une île de la passion : La création d'un opéra par Hélène Dorion et Marie-Claire Blais (Book)

2023· article· fr· W4379207345 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Eugénie Tessier

Bibliographic record

VenueCAML Review / Revue de l ACBM · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionDocumentationHumanitiesArtLibrary sciencePsychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Imaginé en amont de la « mise au monde » (p. 5) de l'opéra Yourcenar -Une île de passions 2 , coécrit par Hélène Dorion et Marie-Claire Blais puis mis en musique par Éric Champagne, ce livre documente les traces de sa création.Cet opéra en deux actes explore entre « vérité historique » (p.96) et fiction la vie de la femme de lettres et académicienne Marguerite Yourcenar (née Marguerite Cleenewerck de Crayencour, 1903de Crayencour, -1987)).Rythmé par le récit de la carrière littéraire de cette autrice non conformiste, cet opéra de production québécoise jette principalement un regard sur ses relations avec Grace Frick et Jerry Wilson, « deux figures majeures et d'aspects opposés de sa vie » (p.97).Bien que la figure de Yourcenar occupe un rôle central dans la démarche décrite par les membres de l'équipe de création dans ce livre, la structure de l'ouvrage permet d'entrevoir la façon dont l'articulation du thème de l'antagonisme, développé dans le livret de Dorion et Blais, traverse le récit pour se refléter à même les activités de création qui entourent la production de l'opéra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCAML Review / Revue de l ACBM→Same topicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→