Enhanced CO2 mineralization and selective critical metal extraction from olivine and laterites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CO 2 mineralization is a significant method for effective CO 2 emission control because of formation of stable carbonate products and the availability of abundant mineral resources. The economic concern of the direct aqueous CO 2 mineralization prevents the application to global warming mitigation. This work discovers that the CO 2 mineralization of olivine can be significantly enhanced by using nitriloacetate (NTA) salt due to the competitive complexation and extraction of nickel and cobalt versus carbonate precipitation. The highly selective critical metal extraction can be also achieved and even considerably enhanced by using NTA compared to using ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) salt. Nearly 90% CO 2 mineralization, nickel and cobalt extraction can be achieved and is suitable for both nickel-poor olivine and nickel-rich saprolite and limonite laterites. The recovery of nickel and cobalt makes the CO 2 mineralization process favourable in both economics and technical outcome. The enhanced CO 2 mineralization process can potentially earn $29, $557, and $221 net benefits for each t olivine, saprolite, and limonite, respectively. The success of the CO 2 mineralization in technical and economic feasibility can potentially make the CO 2 mineralization widely applicable and can make significant contributions to sustainable minerals engineering and resources management, and enhanced supply of critical metals and CO 2 storage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it