MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379230796 · doi:10.3390/met13061061

Phase Transformation Behaviors and Dislocation Evolutions of an Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy under Annealing Treatment

2023· article· en· W4379230796 on OpenAlexaff
Xiankun Ji, Haiming Xie, Jinlong Su, Fulin Jiang, Jie Teng, Hui Zhang, Baoqi Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueMetals · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAnnealing (glass)Lamellar structureAlloyTitanium alloyDiffusionless transformationMicrostructureDislocationMartensiteMetallurgyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post annealing treatment is generally needed for additively manufactured titanium alloy to decompose metastable phases, alleviate residual stress, and improve ductility. In this work, in-situ electrical resistivity and line profile analysis of X-ray diffraction were utilized for monitoring phase transformation behaviors and dislocation evolutions of a laser powder bed fusion-built Ti-6Al-4V alloy under post annealing treatment. Besides, hardness and tensile tests were adopted for revealing the effects of phase transformation and dislocation evolutions on the mechanical properties. The results indicated that post annealing treatment decomposed martensitic α′ into lamellar α + β and eliminated dislocations efficiently. The martensite decomposition rate increased with the annealing temperature. Annealing at 700 °C for 4 h eliminated 98% of the dislocations, and further annealing has only a limited influence on the dislocation density. Annealing at 700 °C for 16 h is beneficial for achieving a high ductility of 10.3% owing to the favorable equilibrium lamellar α + β microstructure. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing post annealing treatment procedures to enhance the mechanical properties of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetalsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207