MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379231583 · doi:10.23977/cpcs.2023.070108

Cell base station traffic prediction based on GRU

2023· article· en· W4379231583 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tenglong Xu, Yi‐Jia Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing Performance and Communication systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive integrated moving averageBase stationArtificial neural networkComputer scienceData miningTraffic generation modelConvolutional neural networkBase (topology)Network traffic simulationTime seriesReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceSimulationNetwork traffic controlComputer networkMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the expansion of Internet technology and network scale, the data volume of base station traffic also shows explosive growth. Predicting base station network traffic has high practical guiding significance for network research, management and control. Aiming at the problem of accurate prediction of base station traffic, this paper proposes a gated recurrent unit neural network model (GRU model) based on neural network algorithm, which can predict the base station traffic data according to the periodicity and fluctuating characteristics of base station traffic data. After experimental verification, it shows that compared with the traditional time series prediction model AR model, ARIMA model also has the convolutional neural network model based on neural network algorithm. This method has higher accuracy and smaller experimental error in mobile communication traffic prediction. The MAE value is optimized by 27.04%, 37.89% and 9.12%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing Performance and Communication systemsSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207