MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379233233 · doi:10.1016/j.sesci.2023.04.001

Genesis and exhumation of the Kongur-Muztaghata and Maeryang gneiss domes in NE Pamir since the Mesozoic

2023· article· en· W4379233233 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiqin Xu, Bihai Zheng, Shaocheng Ji, Zhihui Cai, Hui Cao, Guangwei Li, Xijie Chen, Hua Xiang, Fenghua Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueSolid Earth Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersInstitute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological SciencesState Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits ResearchChinese Academy of Geological SciencesUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraNanjing UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeologyTerraneGneissAnatexisProtolithGeochemistryMetamorphic core complexMetamorphismZirconMetamorphic rockPaleozoicMantle (geology)PaleontologyPartial meltingTectonicsExtensional definition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kongur-Muztaghata-Maeryang terrane in NE Pamir is considered to be the western extension of the Songpan-Ganze terrane located in the northern Tibetan Plateau. The Kongur-Muztaghata gneiss dome (KMGD) is situated in the north while the Maeryang gneiss dome (MYGD) is in the south. The KMGD comprises Triassic granites and granitic gneiss in the core and Early Paleozoic-Triassic sediments in the mantle that underwent Barrovian-type and Buchan-type metamorphisms. Based on geochemical and geochronological data, the Kongur-Muztaghata magmatic arc was formed around ∼252–204 Ma due to northward subduction of the Paleo-Tethys Jinsha oceanic slab. The collision of the Kongur-Muztaghata magmatic arc and the Qiangtang terrane occurred subsequently. Previous research suggested that the KMGD was formed in the Miocene (21–8 Ma). However, our new in-situ monazite U–Pb data for the mantled metasediment shows that the KMGD was initially formed at ∼198 Ma. The MYGD is comprised of an Early Paleozoic-Triassic metasediment mantle and a Cambrian anatexis complex core that underwent Barrovian-Buchan metamorphisms. Our new structural, geochemical, and geochronological data suggest that the protolith of the Maeryang orthogneiss was formed around ∼519-513 Ma, with the surrounding Early Paleozoic metavolcanic rocks erupted at ∼519-508 Ma. Together, they formed the Early Cambrian magmatic complex. In-situ U–Pb dating of monazites and zircon metamorphic rims for the Triassic metamorphic rocks in the mantle indicate that the Barrovian-Buchan metamorphism in the MYGD occurred around ∼206-187 Ma, likely caused by anatexis in the deep crust of the gneiss dome core. Thus, we propose that the KMGD and MYGD underwent a two-stage exhumation: the initial uplift during the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic thermo-tectonic event associated with the Cimmerian orogeny and the late rapid exhumation since the Miocene driven by the collision between the Eurasian and Indian plates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSolid Earth SciencesSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207