A novel crossover operator for genetic algorithm: Stas crossover
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genetic algorithm (GA) is a natural selection-inspired optimization algorithm. It is a population-based search algorithm that utilizes the concept of survival of the fittest. This study creates a new crossover operator called “Stas Crossover” that is a combination of four crossover operators, including Single point crossover, Two points crossover, Arithmetic crossover, and Scattered crossover, and then presents the performance of this crossover operator. The area size and probability of Stas crossover can be adjusted.GA is used to find the optimal solution for this multi-product and multi-period aggregate production planning (APP) problem, which was used to test the algorithm, which provides optimal levels of inventory, backorders, overtime and regular production rates, and other controllable variables. According to the findings of this study, the benefit of stable crossover is that it allows for more variety in the way offspring are created and increases the opportunity for offspring to obtain good genetic information directly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it