Determinants of woodcraft family business success
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The woodcraft industry has been developing in Bali for more than half a century in the form of family business (SMEs) which is currently managed by the third generation or the transition from the second to the third generation, where this phase is the climax of the family business. Apart from contributing to tourism, this craft business also has cultural values. Moreover, the tourism situation and macroeconomic shocks have had an impact on business conditions. This research aims to analyze the performance of a woodcraft family business based on a family and financial approach, through a two by two matrix analysis as well as to analyze the determining factors of willingness to succession of woodcraft family business in Bali, with MICMAC analysis. The results show that the performance of the family business in this case is high emotional but low financial capital. There are 18 identified factors related to the willingness to succeed in the woodcraft family business, and the most influential factor (existing and forecasting) is the participative leadership style, while the most dependent is personal interest which is the involvement of the successor from an early age in family business activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".