Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: We report a case of distal right radial cutaneous sensory neuropathy secondary to participation in Pickle Ball. Methods: Case Report & Review of the LiteratureResults: Our 67yoF patient developed acute onset persistent numbness and dysesthesia in the distal right radial sensory distribution while participating in Pickle Ball, a sport undergoing rapid growth of popularity over the past decade. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) were performed in our lab following symptom onset, and the patient had previous NCS that allowed for comparison. NCS in our lab demonstrated asymmetrically reduced amplitude of right distal radial sensory responses (14.5 uV), in comparison to normal (42 uV) radial sensory responses from her previous NCS using the same protocol. All remaining NCS were normal in both studies. Conclusions: This study represents the first reported case within the literature of a Pickle Ball induced distal radial cutaneous sensory neuropathy demonstrated objectively using comparative nerve conduction studies. It is important that clinicians be aware of this entity and the possibility that it can manifest in the context of activities involving repetitive extension of the wrist. We present this case along with a review of the current literature of focal neuropathies involving the upper & lower extremities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".