MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Six-year safety and efficacy results from the CHRONOS-1 study of the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.

2023· article· en· W4379281872 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Dreyling, Armando Santoro, Sirpa Leppä, Judit Demeter, George Follows, Georg Lenz, Won Seog Kim, Luigina Mollica, Arnon Nagler, Colin Phipps Diong, Mariano Provencio, Massimo Magagnoli, Atanas Radinoff, Javier Muñoz, Anjun Cao, Florian Hiemeyer, Fatuma Odongo, J. Garcia‐Vargas, Barrett H. Childs, Pier Luigi Zinzani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineClinical endpointAdverse effectFollicular lymphomaRegimenPhases of clinical researchRefractory (planetary science)SurgeryLymphomaGastroenterologyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7555 Background: The efficacy of copanlisib, an intravenous pan-class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, was demonstrated in the Phase II CHRONOS-1 study in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell lymphoma (Dreyling et al. J Clin Oncol 2017). Copanlisib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2017 for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who have received ≥2 therapies. Here, we describe updated efficacy and safety data from patients with FL at the 6-year follow-up of CHRONOS-1. Methods: CHRONOS-1 included patients with relapsed or refractory indolent FL (grades 1-3a) who had received ≥2 lines of therapy. Copanlisib 60 mg was administered via intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Objective tumor response rate (ORR) was assessed by independent radiologic review (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2007) as the primary efficacy endpoint. Safety analysis included adverse events graded using CTCAE v4.03. Results: 104 patients with FL were treated in CHRONOS-1, of whom 99.0% ( n= 103) discontinued treatment at the time of database cut-off on June 30, 2022. 72% of patients ( n= 75) received ≥1 line of subsequent systemic anti-cancer therapy during follow-up, with 40% receiving a rituximab-based regimen. At the cut-off, ORR (primary endpoint) was 57.7% ( n= 60), with 19.2% ( n= 20) of patients achieving a complete response. Median duration of response was 12.2 months (range 1.1-48.1). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.2 months (range 0.2-51.5) with a median follow-up of 20.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.5, 31.5); PFS rate was 32% at 2 years. Median overall survival was 46.3 months (range 0.7-82.9) with a total of 56 events and a median follow-up of 82.4 months (95% CI 79.3, 84.9); survival rate was 43% at 6 years. Median duration of treatment was 6.0 months (range 0.23-80.9). No patients experienced transformation to aggressive lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). The primary reasons for stopping treatment included radiologic disease progression (42.3%; n= 44) and adverse events not associated with clinical disease progression (29.8%; n= 31). The safety profile was consistent with the reported 2-year follow-up data (Dreyling et al. Am J Hematol 2020). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades/grades 3-4) were infusion-related hyperglycemia (50.0%/39.5%), diarrhea (36.5%/8.7%), hypertension (28.8%/23.1%), pyrexia (27.9%/4.8%), and neutropenia (26.0%/23.0%). Conclusions: Copanlisib continued to induce robust response and durable survival in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent FL at 6 years of follow-up. Copanlisib was well tolerated, with no new safety signals and no evidence of malignant transformation. These results further support the long-term use of copanlisib in this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT01660451 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→