Results from the pivotal phase (Ph) 2b HERIZON-BTC-01 study: Zanidatamab in previously-treated HER2-amplified biliary tract cancer (BTC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4008 Background: For patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic BTC who progress after first-line treatment (tx), standard tx offers limited clinical benefit with modest improvement in survival. HER2-targeted therapies have improved survival in breast and gastric cancer, but there is no approved HER2-targeted therapy for BTC. Zanidatamab (zani), a HER2-targeted bispecific antibody, has shown durable responses in a subset of pts with BTC in a Ph 1 trial. Methods: HERIZON-BTC-01, an open-label, global Ph 2b study (NCT04466891), evaluated zani (20 mg/kg IV every 2 wks) in pts with HER2-amplified, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BTC (gallbladder cancer [GBC], intra-/extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma [ICC/ECC]) who had received prior gemcitabine-containing therapy; pts with prior HER2-targeted therapies were excluded. Pt cohort assignment was based on tumor immunohistochemistry (IHC) status: Cohort 1 for IHC 2+/3+ (HER2 positive), or Cohort 2 for IHC 0/1+. Tumors were assessed every 8 wks per RECIST 1.1. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (cORR) by independent central review (ICR) in Cohort 1. Secondary endpoints included other efficacy and safety outcomes. Results: Enrollment is complete with 87 pts (Cohort 1, n=80; Cohort 2, n=7) treated. Median age was 64 yrs (range, 32-79); 54% were female; 66% were Asian; 52% had GBC, 30% ICC, and 18% ECC. Pts had a median of 1 line (range, 1-7) of prior therapy in the locally advanced/metastatic setting. In Cohort 1, cORR was 41% with median duration of response (DOR) of 12.9 months (m; 95% CI: 5.95, not estimable); median study follow-up time was 12.4 m. Among the 33 responders at the data cut (10OCT2022), 49% had ongoing responses and 82% had a DOR of ≥16 wks. Median time to first response was 1.8 m (range, 1.6-5.5). Progression-free survival and overall survival are being evaluated. No responses were observed in Cohort 2. In both cohorts (N=87), tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 72% of pts; TRAEs in ≥10% of pts were diarrhea (37%) and infusion-related reaction (33%). Gr 3 TRAEs occurred in 18% of pts, with diarrhea (4.6%) and ejection fraction (EF) decreased (3.4%) in >3% of pts. Two pts (2.3%) discontinued zani due to an AE (EF decreased and non-infectious pneumonitis). Seven pts had serious TRAEs; no AE preferred term occurred in >1 pt. No zani-related Gr 4 AEs or deaths were reported. Conclusions: Results of the pivotal HERIZON-BTC-01 study indicate that the HER2 bispecific antibody zani demonstrates rapid, durable responses with a manageable safety profile in pts with tx-refractory HER2-positive BTC. Given these data, zani continues to be developed as a tx option in HER2-positive BTC. Clinical trial information: NCT04466891 . [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".