MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379285184 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/nt8re

Makalah Perwakafan Kelompok 4

2023· preprint· id· W4379285184 on OpenAlexaff
Ainun Muthahhara

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Finance and Communication
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wakaf adalah bentuk perbuatan ibadah yang sangat mulia di mata Allah Swt karena memberikan harta bendanya secara cuma–cuma, yang tidak setiap orang bisa melakukannya dan merupakan bentuk kepedulian, tanggung jawab terhadap sesama dan kepentingan umum yang banyak memberikan manfaat. Wakaf dikenal sejak masa Nabi Muhammad Saw. Wakaf disyariatkan saat beliau hijrah ke Madinah, pada tahun kedua Hijriah. Ada dua pendapat yang berkembang di kalangan ahli yurisprudensi Islam (fuqaha’) tentang siapa yang pertama kali melaksanakan syariat wakaf. Menurut sebagian pendapat Ulama mengatakan bahwa yang pertama kali melaksanakan wakaf adalah Nabi Muhammad Saw ialah wakaf tanah milik Nabi Muhammad Saw untuk dibangun masjid

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslamic Finance and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207