Phase II randomized window of opportunity trial evaluating cytotoxic and immunomodulatory effects of intratumoral INT230-6 in early stage breast cancer: The INVINCIBLE trial.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
573 Background: Most breast cancers are considered immunological cold and are therefore minimally responsive to immunotherapies. Local cytotoxic therapies can induce cell death, expose tumor antigens, provide adjuvants for anti-tumor immune priming, and potentially increase responsiveness to immunotherapies. We conducted a randomized, double blind, Phase 2 presurgical Window-Of-Opportunity trial for intratumoral (IT) INT230-6 (comprising VINblastine (VIN) Cisplatin (VIN)) evaluating clinical and BioLogical Effects in patients with early-stage operable Breast Cancer (the INVINCIBLE trialNCT04781725. The trial evaluated the immune response within the tumor and microenvironment in vivo after IT INT230-6 injections. Methods: Women with newly diagnosed and awaiting surgery for early-stage intermediate or high-grade ER+ T1-T2 invasive breast cancers were recruited to the trial. Participating patients were allocated (2:1) to IT injections of INT230-6 vs saline placebo, prior to resection. RNA profiling of the pre- (baseline biopsy) and post- treatment (surgical resection) tumours using the Ion AmpliSeq Transcriptome Human Gene Expression (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DNA sequencing using a large (500 gene) comprehensive genomic profiling panel (OCAPlus,) was performed. Results: Significant tumor necrosis was observed in the majority of subjects injected with INT230-6. In the 60 pre-treatment biopsies profiled with OCAPlus, the genes most frequently mutated included PIK3CA (38%), TP53 (23%), CDH1 (22%) and TBX3 (17%). Frequent copy number changes were identified in CCND1 (23%), FGFR1 (18%), and CDH1 (17%). Gene expression analysis showed significant differential gene expression between the baseline biopsy and surgical specimens in patients treated with the drug. Pathway analysis identified genes associated with TCR signaling, macrophage markers, IL-18 signaling and B cell receptor signaling were significantly up-regulated in the post treatment samples. Conclusions: This is the first study evaluating the potential biologic effects of intratumoral cytotoxicity with INT230-6 and its role as a potential immune priming therapy in traditional immune quiescent ER+ breast cancers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".