MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Final results from SAUL, a single-arm international real-world study of atezolizumab (atezo) in 1004 patients (pts) with pretreated locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma (UTC).

2023· article· en· W4379337628 on OpenAlexaff
Cora N. Sternberg, Yohann Loriot, Ernest Choy, Daniel Castellano, Fernando Lopez-Rios Moreno, Giuseppe Luigi Banna, Ugo De Giorgi, Cristina Masini, Aristotelis Bamias, Xavier García del Muro, Ignacio Durán, Thomas Powles, Marija Gamulin, Friedemann Zengerling, Lajos Géczi, Craig Gedye, Robert Huddart, Geetha Kandula, Pari Skamnioti, Axel S. Merseburger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
FundersRoche
KeywordsMedicineAtezolizumabDiscontinuationClinical endpointInternal medicineMetastatic Urothelial CarcinomaAdverse effectUrologyPopulationOncologyClinical trialSurgeryImmunotherapyGastroenterologyCancerUrothelial carcinomaBladder cancerNivolumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4569 Background: In the SAUL study (NCT02928406), clinical outcomes in a broad population were similar to findings from phase 3 trials of anti-PD-(L)1 in highly selected pts. We report the final analysis 4 y after enrolling the last pt. Methods: Eligible pts had locally advanced/metastatic urothelial or non-urothelial UTC that had progressed during or after 1–3 prior lines of therapy for advanced UTC (or within 12 months of [neo]adjuvant therapy). Unlike most phase 3 immunotherapy trials, pts with autoimmune disease (AID), ECOG PS 2, creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥15–30 mL/min, and/or stable CNS metastases were eligible. Pts took atezo 1200 mg q3w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and duration of response (DoR). Results: Among 997 treated pts, 10% had ECOG PS 2, 5% had CrCl <30 mL/min, 4% had a history of AID, and 7% had 2–3 prior lines of therapy. At data cutoff (Dec 20, 2022; median follow-up 55 mo), 78% of pts had died. Median treatment duration was 2.8 mo (range 0–62 mo; mean 9.5 mo), 96 pts (10%) took atezo for >3 y, and 68 (7%) for >4 y. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 51%; AEs led to atezo discontinuation in 8%. We show outcomes overall and in key subgroups. OS was >4 y in 136 pts (14%); 132 responders had OS >2 y. Conclusions: After 55 mo median follow-up, median OS was 8.6 mo and 3-y OS was 21% in a real-world population including important understudied subgroups. Long-term safety data continue to support the tolerability of atezo in pts with complex comorbidities. AESIs were not increased in pts typically considered to be at increased risk of immune-related AEs. OS was similar to trials in highly selected pts. Ongoing analyses are characterizing pts with exceptional long-term outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT02928406 . [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→