MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Combinatorial immune biomarkers of efficacy on buparlisib and paclitaxel in patients with SCCHN: BERIL-1 sub-analysis.

2023· article· en· W4379345743 on OpenAlexaff
Denis Soulières, Justin Lucas, Sherry L. Xu, Sunny Lu, Kevin Dreyer, Nanhai He, Tom Tang, Lars Birgerson, Lisa Licitra, Sandrine Faivre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImmune systemOncologyInternal medicinePaclitaxelCDKN2AChemotherapyCancerImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e18030 Background: Previous analysis of the BERIL-1 Phase 2 clinical trial (Soulieres et al, CCR, 2018), evaluating the efficacy of Buparlisib + Paclitaxel, was one of the largest genomic landscape analyses to date in metastatic SCCHN. With the recent approval of PD-1 in this indication, we sought to expand the analysis, focusing on combinatorial biomarkers of immune infiltration in addition to specific genomic alterations. The goal is to evaluate hierarchically prognostic and predictive biomarkers to select predefined analysis in the current Phase 3 clinical trial, BURAN (NCT04338399) post immune modulatory therapy. Methods: The results of this analysis focused on combination of genomic alterations in both tumor and plasma samples. Alterations found in tumor versus plasma revealed over 50 differentially altered genes. Combination of these sample types is more comprehensive of the patients’ true mutational and copy number status; no significant differences in alteration frequency between treatment and placebo treatment arms were identified. We evaluated correlations between select biomarkers and improvement in efficacy end points of Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) between the treatment and control arms and within the treatment arm. Results: The most frequently altered genes were, TP53 (49%), NOTCH1 (21%), PIK3CA (19%), FAT1 (15%), and CDKN2A (13%). Previous analysis demonstrated that TP53 mutations as well as high immune infiltration (> 10% intratumoral or stromal TILs) showed improvement in PFS & OS. Further improvement to OS was observed in subjects with high immune infiltration and TP53 (p = .031, HR = 0.52), PIK3CA (p = .005, HR = 0.34), NOTCH1(p = .046, HR = 0.13) or FAT1(p = .007; HR = 0.28) alterations when compared to non-altered subjects in the treatment arm. Further improvement to PFS was observed in subjects with high immune infiltration and TP53(p = .031, HR = 0.52) or FAT1(p = .006, HR = 0.23) alterations when compared to non-altered subjects in the treatment arm; NOTCH1 alterations showed strong trends in improved PFS. Additionally, high tumor mutational burden (TMB) combined with alterations in the TP53 pathway showed significant OS improvement (p = .052, HR = 0.44) compared with the placebo arm. Conclusions: This analysis highlights unique insights into the mechanism of Buparlisib and Paclitaxel in of metastatic SCCHN patients; a significant improvement in efficacy observed when specific alterations are considered in the context of immune infiltration. These observations will be further explored in the ongoing Phase 3 clinical trial, BURAN. Additional analysis to be presented at the meeting include prognostic and predictive value of each biomarker and combination, differences between tumor and plasma samples, and comparison with end of treatment samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→