MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4379347567 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2023.89

C.3 Development and validation of a prediction model for perinatal arterial ischemic stroke in term neonates

2023· article· en· W4379347567 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ratika Srivastava, Mary Dunbar, Michael Shevell, Maryam Oskoui, Anna Basu, Michael Rivkin, Eilon Shany, LS de Vries, Deborah Dewey, Nicole Létourneau, Michael D. Hill, Adam Kirton

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesWorkers Compensation Board of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLogistic regressionClinical prediction ruleStroke (engine)ChorioamnionitisApgar scoreConcordancePregnancyPediatricsBirth weightGestational ageInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS) is a focal brain injury in term neonates, identified postnatally but presumed to occur around birth. Early risk detection and targeted treatments are limited. We developed and validated a diagnostic risk prediction model from common clinical factors to predict a term neonate’s probability of PAIS. Methods: A diagnostic prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression. Common pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal clinical factors were collected across four registries. Variable selection was based on peer-reviewed literature. Participant inclusion criteria were term birth and no underlying predisposition to stroke. The primary outcome was discriminative accuracy of the model predicting PAIS, measured by the concordance (C-) statistic. Results: 2571 participants (527 cases, 2044 controls) were eligible for analysis. Nine variables were included in the model – maternal age, tobacco exposure, recreational drug exposure, pre-eclampsia, chorioamnionitis, maternal fever, emergency c-section, low 5-minute Apgar score, and sex – to predict the risk of PAIS in a term neonate. This model demonstrated good discrimination between cases and controls (C-statistic 0.73) and model fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0.20). Conclusions: Clinical variables can be used to develop and internally validate a model of PAIS risk prediction. Identifying high-risk neonates for early screening and treatment could reduce lifelong morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→