IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PENGADAAN BARANG/ JASA PEMERINTAH TENTANG PROGRAM BELA PENGADAAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TThe purpose of this study was to examine the implementation of the policy of the decision at the regional office of the BPN, North Sumatra Province through George Edward III's theory of policy implementation, and to examine the inhibiting factors in implementing the policy. The method used is descriptive qualitative, using data collection techniques through interviews, observations and documentation studies. The data analysis technique uses the Miles, Huberman Saldana interactive model with the stages of data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study found that the Procurement of Bela program at the BPN Regional Office of North Sumatra Province had been carried out well, and it could be said that the procurement officials had succeeded. This can be seen from the communication factor that exists between procurement officials and other stakeholders. The existence of competent human resources and adequate infrastructure resources. There is an attitude of implementers who are highly committed in carrying out their duties, and the activities of procuring goods and services are in accordance with the procedures or procedures drawn up by LKPP. However, there are still obstacles related to the lack of provider participation in the procurement of Bela platform, resulting in a lack of product choices. In addition, there are still obstacles in ordering consumption for the sake of meeting or large events, especially those that are carried out impromptu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it