Knowledge Discovery in Ubiquitous and Personal Sleep Tracking: Scoping Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past few decades, there has been a rapid increase in the number of wearable sleep trackers and mobile apps in the consumer market. Consumer sleep tracking technologies allow users to track sleep quality in naturalistic environments. In addition to tracking sleep per se, some sleep tracking technologies also support users in collecting information on their daily habits and sleep environments and reflecting on how those factors may contribute to sleep quality. However, the relationship between sleep and contextual factors may be too complex to be identified through visual inspection and reflection. Advanced analytical methods are needed to discover new insights into the rapidly growing volume of personal sleep tracking data. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to summarize and analyze the existing literature that applies formal analytical methods to discover insights in the context of personal informatics. Guided by the problem-constraints-system framework for literature review in computer science, we framed 4 main questions regarding general research trends, sleep quality metrics, contextual factors considered, knowledge discovery methods, significant findings, challenges, and opportunities of the interested topic. METHODS: Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, Springer, Fitbit Research Library, and Fitabase were searched to identify publications that met the inclusion criteria. After full-text screening, 14 publications were included. RESULTS: The research on knowledge discovery in sleep tracking is limited. More than half of the studies (8/14, 57%) were conducted in the United States, followed by Japan (3/14, 21%). Only a few of the publications (5/14, 36%) were journal articles, whereas the remaining were conference proceeding papers. The most used sleep metrics were subjective sleep quality (4/14, 29%), sleep efficiency (4/14, 29%), sleep onset latency (4/14, 29%), and time at lights off (3/14, 21%). Ratio parameters such as deep sleep ratio and rapid eye movement ratio were not used in any of the reviewed studies. A dominant number of the studies applied simple correlation analysis (3/14, 21%), regression analysis (3/14, 21%), and statistical tests or inferences (3/14, 21%) to discover the links between sleep and other aspects of life. Only a few studies used machine learning and data mining for sleep quality prediction (1/14, 7%) or anomaly detection (2/14, 14%). Exercise, digital device use, caffeine and alcohol consumption, places visited before sleep, and sleep environments were important contextual factors substantially correlated to various dimensions of sleep quality. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review shows that knowledge discovery methods have great potential for extracting hidden insights from a flux of self-tracking data and are considered more effective than simple visual inspection. Future research should address the challenges related to collecting high-quality data, extracting hidden knowledge from data while accommodating within-individual and between-individual variations, and translating the discovered knowledge into actionable insights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".