Postoperative Spinal 18F-FDG PET Pseudoprogression Mimicking Malignancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: A 60-year-old woman presented with left upper limb weakness. Spinal MRI revealed C2-C3 heterogeneous mass with no hypermetabolic foci on 18 F-FDG PET. Total resection was performed, and the pathology showed gliosis. Her limb weakness worsened 3 months after surgery. Spinal MRI revealed long intramedullary mass from medulla oblongata to C5, which showed obvious hypermetabolism under 18 F-FDG PET with an SUV max of 7.11, but 18 F-FET PET indicated mild hypermetabolism with an SUV max of 2.29. Malignancy was suspected, and C2-C4 biopsy was performed. The pathology results confirmed the diagnosis of gliosis, and the postoperative spinal 18 F-FDG PET results were considered pseudoprogression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".