Co-culture of <i>Kluyveromyces marxianus</i> and <i>Meyerozyma guilliermondii</i> with <i>In Situ</i> Product Recovery of 2-Phenylethanol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Production of 2-phenylethanol (2-PE) via Kluyveromyces marxianus is well-established. However, co-culture with other microbes in combination with in situ product recovery (ISPR) yields improved selectivity and volumetric productivity. Fermentation of K. marxianus (MUCL 53775) with direct inclusion of absorptive polymer Hytrel3548 achieved ISPR, but accumulation of the byproduct phenylethyl acetate (PEA) was strongly favored. Co-culture of K. marxianus (MUCL 53775) with Meyerozyma guilliermondii (MUCL 28072) with ISPR limited PEA production, thereby improving the 2-PE selectivity from 13 to 90%, compared to a pure culture of K. marxianus (MUCL 53775) under similar conditions. This improved the volumetric productivity by 85% compared to 2-PE ISPR with a pure culture of K. marxianus . This is the first report of co-culture in a two-phase fermentation for 2-PE bioproduction and demonstrates that interactions between co-culture and ISPR techniques can modulate bioproduction between 2-PE and byproduct PEA, and this technique will be explored for other strain combinations and for other high-value molecules of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".