MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379382245 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2023.3282791

A Data-Driven Digital Demodulator Based on Deep Learning for Radio Over Fiber Transmission System

2023· article· en· W4379382245 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDemodulationQuadrature amplitude modulationElectronic engineeringQAMBit error rateComputer scienceDigital radioEncoderData transmissionEngineeringTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsComputer hardwareChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A data-driven digital demodulator based on a Fourier layer Transformer network (FTnet) for radio over fiber (RoF) transmission system with quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) is developed and experimentally demonstrated. The FTnet combines the Transformer encoder with the Fourier layer to learn the waveforms and directly recover the bitstreams from the impaired received signals. The FTnet-based demodulator does not rely on a series of digital demodulation algorithms such as frequency offset compensation, down-conversion, equalization, and decoding, making the process more efficient and accurate. The 10 GHz 2 Gsym/s 25 km RoF transmission systems are established to evaluate the proposed FTnet-based digital demodulator experimentally. The results show that the bit error rates (BERs) performance of the proposed demodulator for the 16-QAM RoF is better than the ones based on a fully connected neural network, Transformer, and traditional digital demodulator with the least mean square error equalizer (TDD-LMS). The optical receiving sensitivity for the 64-QAM RoF system based on the proposed demodulator is improved by 3 dB compared to TDD-LMS under a BER limit of 3.8 × 10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−3</sup> . Furthermore, our proposed demodulator outperforms other demodulators for the RoF system with wireless transmission at different received optical powers and wireless distances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it